- 0
- 타이쿤
- 조회 수 22
#
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/421/0002428394
https://www.skyedaily.com/news/news_view.html?ID=257600
#
대천덕 신부
고등학교시절 자연히 나는 사회주의에 열광했다.대학교에 다니면서 많은 중국관련서적을 읽으면서 모택동과 홍군 그리고 대장정에 대해서 깊이 연구했다.점차 나는 사회주의보다는 공산주의가 보다 실현가능성이 높다고 생각했으며 마르크스와 레닌 스탈린의 전서적을 섭렵했다.
https://www.kmib.co.kr/article/viewDetail.asp?newsClusterNo=01100201.19980113000002003
#
Stalin said that the greatest joy is to cultivate a person's
friendship until he lays his head confidently on your bosom, then to implant a dagger in his back - a pleasure not to be surpassed.
-Marx & Satan......Richard Wurmbrand
스탈린은 어떤 사람과 우애를 두텁게 다져, 그 사람이 신뢰하는 마음으로 우리 가슴에 머리를 기대게 한 다음, 그 등에 칼을 꽂는 것이 가장 큰 기쁨이며 다시 없는 즐거움이라고 했다
#
Those who vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
It is enough that the people know there was an election.
The people who cast the votes decide nothing.
The people who count the votes decide everything.
― Joseph Stalin
투표하는 사람은 아무것도 결정하지 않는다.
개표하는 사람들이 모든 것을 결정한다.
사람들이 선거가 있었다는 것을 아는 것만으로도 충분하다.
투표를 한 사람들은 아무것도 결정하지 않는다.
개표하는 사람들이 모든 것을 결정한다.
ㅡ조셉 스탈린
#
Call democracy until democracy is ruined. Communists must do examples of law violations, lies, deceptions, and actually cover-ups.ㅡVladimir Il'ich Lenin 레닌
민주주의가 망할 때까지 민주주의를 외쳐라. 공산주의자는 법률위반, 거짓말, 속임수, 사실은폐 따위를 예사로 해치우지 않으면 안된다
(4) 소결
위에서 인정한 비례대표 부정경선, 중앙위원회 폭력 사건 및 ○○을 지역구 여론조작 사건은 피청구인의 당원들이 토론과 표결에 기반하지 않고 폭력적 수단으로 자신들이 지지하는 후보의 당선을 관철시키려 한 것으로서 민주사회에서는 도저히 있을 수 없는 행태이고, 당내 민주적 의사형성을 왜곡하고 선거제도를 형해화하여 민주주의 원리를 훼손하는 것이다.
아. 피청구인의 진정한 목적과 활동
(1) 과거 민주노동당 또는 피청구인 내에서 같이 활동하다가 피청구인 주도세력과의 헤게모니 쟁탈전에서 패배하였거나 그들의 본질을 파악하고 더 이상 정당활동을 함께 할 수 없다 하여 탈당한 사람들이야말로 피청구인 주도세력의 성향과 실체를 누구보다도 정확하게 알고 있을 것이다. 그들은 피청구인 주도세력에 대하여, “유독 국가보안법 사건에서는 진보운동의 상식과 이성이 마비된다는 사실을 알았다.”(심○정), “자주파에게는 북한이 신성불가침의 영역이다. 특정 정파가 지하당처럼 움직였다. 여기에서 오더를 내리면 그것을 다 관철했다.”(노○찬), “당내 친북세력과 결별하지 않고는 당이 국민의 신뢰를 받을 수 없다.”(조○수), “NL들에게 북한 추종은 종교생활과 같다. 위기의 핵심은 김일성주의자들이 당 안방을 차지한 것이다.”(주○환), “NL의 나침반은 떨지를 않는다. 한 곳에 고정된 고장난 나침반이다.”(이○우), “자주파는 책임은 지지 않고 토론은 이루어지지 않고 공부와 학습도 하지 않는 종북주체일 뿐이다.”(홍○화), “당내 자주파의 종북주의에 근거한 패권주의가 당을 망쳐온 제일 큰 원인이다.”(김○철), “자주파는 북조선노동당의 지도를 받아 움직이는 일종의 통일전선체이다.”(진○권), “NL노선의 알파요 오메가는 바로 북한이다.”(김□영)”는 등으로 말하고 있는바, 이러한 발언들이야말로 바로 피청구인 주도세력의 성향과 실체를 정확하게 표현한 것으로 보인다.
피청구인 주도세력은 “민주주의가 망할 때까지 민주주의를 외쳐라. 공산주의자는 법률위반, 거짓말, 속임수, 사실은폐 따위를 예사로 해치우지 않으면 안된다.”고 한 레닌의 말처럼 용어혼란전술, 속임수전술 등을 통하여 북한식 사회주의의 실현을 ‘민주혁명의 과업’으로 바꾸어 말하고 있고, 그들이 말하는 자주ㆍ민주ㆍ통일이라는 용어도 일반적으로 사용하는 의미와는 전혀 다른 것이다. 그들은 ‘우익 대 좌익’의 싸움을 ‘민족ㆍ민주ㆍ민중 대 반민족ㆍ반민주ㆍ반민중’으로, ‘평화 대 전쟁, 통일 대 반통일, 화해 대 분열’로 포장한다. 나아가 그들은 내면화된 신념으로 무장하며, 자신의 깊숙한 정체를 드러내지 않은 채 조직적으로 활동하여 왔다. 폭력적 방법의 사용도 불사하여 자유민주주의 체제의 파괴를 기도하였다.
https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/detcInfoP.do?mode=1&detcSeq=41693
#
Those who vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
It is enough that the people know there was an election.
The people who cast the votes decide nothing.
The people who count the votes decide everything.
― Joseph Stalin
투표하는 사람은 아무것도 결정하지 않는다.
개표하는 사람들이 모든 것을 결정한다.
사람들이 선거가 있었다는 것을 아는 것만으로도 충분하다.
투표를 한 사람들은 아무것도 결정하지 않는다.
개표하는 사람들이 모든 것을 결정한다.
ㅡ조셉 스탈린
#
Call democracy until democracy is ruined. Communists must do examples of law violations, lies, deceptions, and actually cover-ups.ㅡVladimir Il'ich Lenin 레닌
민주주의가 망할 때까지 민주주의를 외쳐라. 공산주의자는 법률위반, 거짓말, 속임수, 사실은폐 따위를 예사로 해치우지 않으면 안된다
#
인민은 이렇게 다스려야 한다-스탈린
People should be treated like this - Stalin
https://www.newdaily.co.kr/site/data/html/2020/03/06/2020030600217.html
http://www.koreatimes.com/article/20030923/143031
https://medium.com/thrive-global/you-are-bigger-than-your-career-the-stalins-chicken-168a93f58132
You are Bigger Than Your Career — Stalin’s Chicken
The Soviet novelist, Chingiz Aitmatov recounted a story in one of his articles written near the end of the failed Marxist movement in Soviet Union.
In 1935, Stalin invited his trusted senior advisors and some media henchmen to a meeting with intent to make a point using the most evocative of methods. When everyone was gathered at the barnyard, he called for a live chicken and vigorously clenched it in one hand. With the other hand, he then began to pluck out the chicken’s feathers in handfuls. The poor bird squawked under the torment but Stalin kept at denuding the chicken until it convulsed with agony. Remarkably unperturbed by the feeling of disgust obvious on the faces of the people too afraid to express their unease to the dictator, he continued until the chicken was completely unfeathered.
He then put the bird down by a small heap of grain and stood up to finish the last act while the people curiously observed the chicken move towards the grain. As the chicken started to peck, Stalin put his hand into his jacket pocket and pulled out another fistful of grain, putting it out in front of the wounded bird. To the utter surprise of the transfixed spectators, the chicken managed a weak-kneed stagger back to Stalin and started to peck the fresh grain right out of the hand that moments ago had inflicted unbearable pain on it. Stalin had made his point — loud and clear.
He turned to the people and said, “People are like this chicken. It doesn’t matter how much pain you inflict on them. The moment you offer them what they need, they will still follow you and turn to you for their survival.”
To me this anecdote has another, slightly different meaning. It is not ‘despite’ the pain that Stalin inflicted on the poor bird, but ‘because of it’ that it followed him. This explains the working of weak minds — animals’ as well as humans’. Our minds become slaves to those we see as having total power to control us and to cause pain to us. We are quick to give up control of ourselves to those who have the power to rule us as long as they also have the power to feed us. This is the fundamental construct of a feudal society.
The series of events that transpired since the industrial revolution determined the dynamics of today’s social and economic hierarchies. The world saw a polarizing division between the powerful and the weak. It got divided into those who controlled the factors of production and those who worked for the former and depended on them for survival; the employer and the employee — the haves and the have-nots if you will.
The private control of capital coupled with a liberal new structure for the free-market made the poor rich and the rich richer. Private enterprises boomed and commercial ownership got decentralized, but something else happened as well. Amid the much-ballyhooed advent of private business ownership and birth of the ‘corporation,’ a parallel layer in the economic hierarchy was created — those who controlled the owners of private businesses. Paradoxically, it was the centralization of decentralization, the former being invisible to the masses. This was the new face of feudalism.
This made the working class dream a mere fantasy. There was no way you could rise up the ranks to be among the top economic powers by working for the private enterprise. That was simply not part of the deal. Instead, you would be given a certain dollar amount for the time you spent away from your family at the cost of your holistic wellbeing; and with that money, you may buy whatever you wish to buy — goods produced by the same private enterprise — in order to survive and stay healthy enough to turn up for work the next morning. But you dare not demand anything more. Capitalism was born.
With that, we all became salary slaves — too afraid to raise our voices against our providers and oppressors, lest we be laid off. We had willingly given up our freedom in exchange of economic security. Our inner calling and our human purpose took the back seat because for us a more pressing issue was to put food on the table for our children. We did not control the land, nor the industry built atop the land, nor the labour who worked there. We were that labour, and we did not control ourselves. We did not control our time, or our actions. The dream of finding our inner calling was lost forever. And we were so busy surviving that we forgot to live.
People started defining their self-worth by the name of the corporation they worked for. The more reputable the brand name, the more accomplished they felt. And then they were nothing more than what they did between 9:00 to 5:00 in order to survive; it became their identity as their real human identity got lost somewhere in the smoke of the chimneys from all the factories. This breed of employees comprised of millions of educated and uneducated individuals, men and women, who were so ignorant of the potential of their minds and spirits that they had proudly set the bar low for themselves.
The truth is, we are like Stalin’s chicken, pecking the grains out of our tormentor’s hand in order to barely survive. We call this our ‘career’ and adorn our chests with it like shiny badges of chivalry. It is a great complement to call someone career-oriented, not worrying too much about what the tradeoff involves. The truth is that the very definition of modern career is an exchange of one’s freedom for sustenance.
For some among us, the measure of a successful life is more than a career. I call them the first dancers. They are bigger than their careers, and their true self is unshackled not when they have figured out how to best meet his physiological needs, but when they don’t have to worry about their physiological needs anymore. They can put the incredible faculty of their minds to more productive and meaningful uses than to make a living. It surely helps to be economically independent, but such a person does not need to be outrageously opulent to make the transition into a career-free life, he merely needs to be reasonably self-sufficient and content with his material wellbeing.
An additional complexity may arise even after you have insulated your financial position from the ups and downs of your career. That complexity is over-reliance on your knowledge and skills to earn your income. Recall how earned income is essentially based on the work you do — your active employment of your skills, education and talent. This unfortunately is dependent on the demand for your skillset which may change with time, thereby affecting your ability to generate earned income.
As I have explained in my book, there is a good rationale of diversifying your sources of income (whether earned, passive or portfolio) into primary sources of value. That would include natural resources like land, energy sources and minerals. The kind of financial independence that arises from such diversification is far more sustainable over the long run and helps you concentrate on achieving your true human potential without needing to worry about building a career. Over the long term, this freedom gives you the leeway to experiment with your talents and to focus on what you think is truly meaningful in life. Using your mental and physical faculties to achieve your purpose in turns helps you improve your health and wellbeing. So all it takes to get your life back is to stop being a chicken.
공유
